![]() 30, 2002).īecause the ITC correctly construed the “means ․ for displaying the television schedule” limitation of the ′268 patent and correctly found that Scientific-Atlanta did not infringe under its construction, we affirm the decision as to the ′268 patent. 1 In re Certain Set Top Boxes and Components Thereof, Inv. (“Scientific-Atlanta”) did not infringe Gemstar's U.S. (collectively “Gemstar”) appeal from a final order of the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”), concluding that Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Roth, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., of Washington, DC. Browne, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP, of Washington, DC and Frederic M. Potenza, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., of Washington, DC and Louis Norwood Jameson, Duane Morris LLP, of Atlanta, GA. James Adduci, II, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP, of Washington, DC Joseph M. Bankoff, King & Spalding, of Atlanta, GA. On the brief for Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., was Joseph R. Battaglia, Kirkland & Ellis, of Washington, DC Robert G. On the brief for intervenors Pioneer Corporation, Pioneer Digital Technologies, Inc., Pioneer North America, Inc., and Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc. Sobin, Miller & Chevalier Chartered, of Washington, DC. ** Also on the brief for EchoStar, et al., were Rachel Krevans, Ronald P. McElhinny, Morrison & Foerster LLP, for intervenors EchoStar Communications Corporation and SCI Systems, Inc., argued for all intervenors. Lyons, Deputy General Counsel, and Michael Liberman, Attorney. Wayne Herrington, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Donofrio, Hogan & Hartson LLP, of New York, NY. Baldwin, of Washington, DC and Douglas A. Matuschak, Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, MA, and Joseph R. Haigney, Hogan & Hartson LLP, of New York, NY. ![]() Of counsel on the brief were Morris Waisbrot and William F. Lee, Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, MA, argued for appellants. Decided: September 16, 2004īefore MICHEL, CLEVENGER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.*** ![]() INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., Intervenor. and Starsight Telecast, Inc., Appellants, v. United States Court of Appeals,Federal Circuit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |